2012年9月18日星期二

Marco Sturm jerseys

Marco Sturm jerseys -

The bad economy is on everyone's mind as money becomes the center of our worries in these troubling times. We're all concerned about keeping our jobs, watching our savings, watchin our BANKS that keep our savings, and if we're going to be able to keep paying that high house note and car note. Being able to continue to live the lifestyle in which we've become accustomed is a big concern to many these days as we get less for our money and everything costs more but we have less to spend. Investors are especially worried as the Dow Jones takes more hits than gains and stock prices are plunging and returns diminishing. This turn of events makes it harder to find new investors as current investors lose their shirt and would-be investors decide that their money is safer residing in the bank (hopefully). With the fall of financial giants like AIG, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and others it just doesn't sow the seeds of confidence in nervous investors. So when the Stanford Financial Group started getting investigated everyone quickly screamed 'Ponzi scheme!' 'Fraud!' and 'Crook!' These accusations?all may be true but I rather suspect opportunism by investors who took a tumble in the market and want to get their money back through less than honest means.


Eversince Bernie Madoff got revealed to be at the top of a very elaborate and huge Ponzi scheme, that seems to be a catch-phrase for all investors who didn't complain or have suspicions while profits were high and risks low and their returns were enriching them beyond their wildest dreams. Not nary a word from them as long as their money kept coming in on Marco Sturm jerseys time and their investments seemed secure and on time. Well in the world of investments, in which I'm no expert, but I do know that every investor is warned by their broker that they 'could' lose on an investment just as they might gain. Naturally they try to reassure their clients that all is well and their knowledge and skill will keep that from happening to often, but they are still told that there can be losses. Now I can relate that no one wants to lose their money and?that's why I don't invest except in things relating to my work, but when you invest your money in speculative stocks or other risk is part of the equation. You're basically betting against the odds that you'll profit and hopefully you will but there's a big chance that you won't. Well with the economy going south the way it has with the Dow Jones dipping lower than it has in many many years and banks failing due to failed investments a lot of people lost money. With so many big financial concerns getting aid from the government to stay afloat people are mad as hell and wondering why the CEO's get to keep their money and the investors are losing their shirts. I'm in agreement with that but when Stanford Financial got into trouble and their offices got raided by the FBI, I wasn't so sure that they were guilty of running a Ponzi Scheme as they were probably guilty of speculative investing in unproven stocks maybe or in dumb money management designs that left the company top-heavy drawing off of Marco Sturm jerseys profits from the investors to pay inflated salaries. This is all speculation for I haven't seen any of their financial papers and don't know all of the details of why the Feds raided their offices but I'm figuring this is the most likely scenario. But I suspect that when all of the smoke clears we'll find that there is no evidence of a Ponzi Scheme. I do feel there will be evidence of gross mismanagement and incompetance at the highest levels of the organizational structure but a Ponzi Scheme, it's possible but I doubt it. I understand though that to the investors who lost money making the accusation they feel may increase their chances of getting some of their money back but most times in such cases the only thing they have to pay are the fines that the government levels against them but the people who have been defrauded don't get anything so for their part it's a wasted effort. Then too as I've said I think the most they'll be charged with is 'maybe' gross negligence, but it's not a crime to make bad investments unless there was something criminal involved in the investing process. Like many companies?and investment houses out there they suffered some losses and thus the investors took a hit instead of posting gains and now they're sore. Well you knew that this was possible when Marco Sturm jerseys you went into this for investing is not for the feint of heart; if you can't stand to lose your money don't invest. The truth will come in about Stanford Investments and we'll know soon enough whether they defrauded their investors or if like so many other investment brokerage houses are simply victims of the bad economy.

没有评论:

发表评论